Editors Comment
The Sespe Sun would like to invite anyone who
would like to submit a letter to the Editor or an
advertisement. For your convenience you may e-mail
it to
info@thesespesun.com. Prices for classified ads
are $3.50 per week and for all other types of
advertisement you may phone our office at 524-2622
to discuss individual rates.
Any letters to the editor are the opinion of the
writer only and not necessarily the opinion of the
Sespe Sun's owners or employees. The Sespe Sun also
reserves the right to edit the letters.
Due to prior problems, The Sespe Sun is now asking for a
name, address and day time phone number from those
who wish to submit letters to the editor. The Sun
welcomes letters to the editor and feels the right
of free speech is important to every person. Anyone
who would like to submit a letter but is in fear of
retaliation may request their name be withheld, as
long as we can verify the person writing. The Sun
will not publish any foul language, or demeaning of
another individual.
The Sespe Sun.
The Sespe Sun
An online newspaper servicing the Santa Clara Valley in Ventura County.
News may be submitted to the paper by Calling (805) 524-2622 or by cell (805) 727-0535 or by FAX (805) 524-0958 or by our e-mail addresses: info@thesespesun.com or cegedi@sbcglobal.net
The material in this internet publication is protected by copyright with all rights reserved.
Chris Egedi - Owner and
Editor
Les Egedi - publication maintenance Advertising accepted daily.

Beware Of Stolen Internet Domain Names
February 20, 2008
It has come to the attention of The Sespe Sun that unknown persons are sending out drug advertisements using the publication’s e-mail names. The Sun has never sent, nor do we ever intend to send out any mass e-mail advertising. All advertising by the Sun will be within the publication by legitimate advertisers.
For your protection we suggest any e-mail advertising received, supposedly from us, should not be opened and be deleted immediately. We are trying to get this problem solved by Yahoo. Should anyone have any questions we can be reached at 524-2622 or by our e-mail address info@thesespesun.com.
The Sespe Sun
ghased170-wayen316-demenico876-susan-s -brune201-takett-mccawley-sipes-cegedy-and 20 or 30 new ones under different names
The material and photographs are the property of the Sespe Sun and are not to be reproduced or used in any manner without the permission of the publisher of the Sespe Sun. After any article has gone to the Archives the individual stories may be printed. If any information in this on-line news source is found to be used without permission action will be taken to the fullest extent of the law.
Editor
July 29, 2010
Re: Don Gunderson (July 27, 2010)
I believe Mr. Gunderson misunderstands the process that is taking place. Here is the information you need to know. Sewer and water rates have to be increased to pay for the bonds and higher operating costs. Street sweeping costs were removed from the General Fund to help balance the budget. If approved by the voters those costs will be added to their trash bill. The rate increases are subject to property owner approval via a ballot known as Proposition 218. The ballots will be mailed to all property owners in the next several weeks. There will be public hearings at the August 24th and September 14th Council meetings. Your protest ballot must be received by the City by 6:30 PM on September 14th.
I can only speak for myself but in my opinion the fate of these increases lies in the hands of the property owners of Fillmore and how they vote. If the ballot fails then the City will have to reconsider how to pay the water and sewer debt.
As you can imagine, I am also very unhappy about these increases in water, sewer or street sweeping. But, in the end, this is the budget that was presented to the Council. Many cuts were made and are likely still to come. The Mayor made extensive comments at the budget hearing and I agreed that it was important to make the Proposition 218 process easier for the property owners to participate in the vote. Also, our most costly litigation is the Sales Tax issue which was filed prior to the last election and pursuant to Council decisions made in 2003.
Gayle Washburn
July 30, 2010
Mr. Gunderson,
After reading your letter of concern, I am
wondering where these comments are coming from. The decisions that
you oppose are those of past Councils (Hernandez, Cuevas and
Conaway).
Especially since I and so many in the
public asked the Council not to spend so much on the Sewer Plant and
the financing. True, we had no choice but to comply with Water Board
requirements. But we did have a choice on;
1. Where to locate the plant. Past Councils and staff CHOSE to buy
land from the business park developer to anchor and facilitate their
development and to help them pay for the levee. We already owned
land elsewhere that would have been suitable and could have saved
millions in land cost, infrastructure costs and now flood insurance
costs.
2. The City had a CHOICE whether to accept the too high bids. Santa
Paula and Piru both chose to re-bid their systems when the costs
came in too high. (Piru’s $14,000,000 plant was paid for with $8.5M
in grants and $5.5M in a 1% loan. Why didn’t we apply?)
3. We also CHOSE to use municipal bonds rather than the low cost
State Revolving Loans that were recommended in 2004. I am a finance
professional and I know how critical it is to get the lowest
interest rates possible. That wasn’t done.
I and others warned the Council that the
consequences of these choices would be too much of a burden. Now and
for many years it will be. These were CHOICES that were made by
previous Councils who CHOSE to ignore their constituents, not the
new Council. As a candidate for the Fillmore City Council, I stand
firm in my beliefs that when a person is elected to the City
Council, it should behoove them to think of the lasting consequences
and how these decisions will effect the community as a whole; today
and for the future.
Brian Sipes
Editor,
July 9, 2010
I want the citizens of Fillmore, my friends
and family to know that anytime I have something to say in
person, or in print, I will always sign it with my full name and my
local phone number when needed. Please do not think I am involved
with the new group, Reform FUSD.
A notice from this group was printed in last
week’s newspaper and signed with a first name only (Marie) without a
local telephone number. I do not know who they are and why they do
not have a local phone for organizing, but they do not represent me.
I understand frustrations of parents when the school does not follow
what a group of parents wish, and they have every right to run for
the Board. Have they ever considered putting in the same amount of
time and money into improving each school within the district?
I served on the Fillmore Unified School Board for
over 8 years, and I know you need to be a voting member of that
Board to fully understand the complete picture for ALL students in
the district. It is usually a very thankless job. It takes lots of
time and dedication to wade through the many regulations every
district works under and stretch the available money. It is not a
simple job.
My best wishes to the current board members and the
effort they have given to the problems this past year. My best
wishes to any new board members if they are elected and I hope they
quickly have a better understanding of “what being a board
member” really means.
I do not wish to fuss with anyone via “Letters to
the Editor” and I will not lower myself to write again. I will
always identify myself in full when I wish to make a statement.
Marie Wren
Editor:
July 27, 2010
The following is an excerpt from the July 22 VC Star article dealing with the City of Fillmore current budget:
“‘It’s been repeatedly said that we’re in tough financial times,’ Mayor Patti Walker said. …”
“Walker said the council needs to raise water and sewage rates in the coming months.
“‘We’re going to be increasing their fees to the parks and in the pools,’ she said. ‘We’re asking them to start paying for street sweeping.’ “
Quack, quax, tax!
The water and sewer funds are enterprise funds. Enterprise funds are set up for functions which are supposed to operate like a business. The accounting method used is more like business accounting than governmental accounting. They should not be used to create excess funds to “bail out” other budget areas with shortfalls. An increase in their fees to pay for general fund expenses usually paid from taxes certainly makes excess fees look like a tax.
This would not be the first time this council has ventured into financial areas which have led to litigation. A tax masquerading as a fee is an easy way to get back into the court room.
Don Gunderson
Fillmore
July 28, 2010
In response to Mr. Gunderson’s letter of
July 27, the Council is complying with Prop 218 by taking the
increase in water and sewer rates, and the fee for street sweeping,
to the property owners by way of a protest ballot. The ballot is to
be mailed to property owners and is to be returned to the City no
later than September 14. If the number of ballots returned is 51% of
the number of ballots mailed, the increase in rates will not occur.
It was at my request that the protest
ballot provide the ability for the citizens to have their voice
heard by suggesting to the Council that the Notice include a ballot
to be used to cast their vote - including the parcel number and a
place for their signature.
The Water Enterprise Fund currently does
not have sufficient income to operate and maintain the water system.
The current rate only brings in enough dollars to pay the bond debt.
We are asking property owners to vote on new
sewer fees (to be placed into the Sewer Enterprise Fund) because
Prop 218 requires us to do so every five years as the fee has an
inflationary clause.
With respect to the street sweeping, it has
historically be paid from Gas Tax dollars which had a negative
$20,000 at the end of the last budget cycle. The cost to the
community to provide this service is about $75,000. By October, the
staff and Council need to cut $275,000 more from the General Fund.
If the citizens do not want to pay an additional $1.20 more on their
Harrison trash bill to pay for the sweeping, we will need to further
trim the budget to cover the sweeping charges.
This Council is complying with all aspects
of CA State law and are asking the property owners to vote on all
increases - sewer, water and street sweeping - prior to
implementation.
Patti Walker
Mayor
Editor,
July 6, 2010
The City of Fillmore’s 2010-2011 proposed budget recommends that the
Fillmore Aquatic Center be closed from October to February and that
all fees be raised. Swimming lessons will be raised from $50 to
$75.
Please go to the City website to view the
proposed budget. Please become informed and ask questions of your
Council members. Please attend the July 13th Council
meeting to hear discussion of the proposed budget.
Regards,
Cindy Blatt Fillmore